![]() In creating a sustainable, enterprise-wide innovation discipline the road is long (at least 5 years, if not more) and fraught with difficulties and complications.īut the alternatives - irrelevance, bankruptcy, and oblivion - are much scarier. ![]() There are no silver bullets - whether the 80/20 rule or anything else. They have embraced innovation as a company-wide discipline, making innovation part of everyone’s job. Companies such as Xerox, Chubb, and Whirlpool have learned how to create sustainable innovation discipline across the enterprise. It’s merely the iceberg-tip of a much larger, and more fundamental, set of issues plaguing modern corporations.įortunately, there is a silver lining. Which is why the focus on the 80/20 rule is a red herring. This leads to one of two outcomes: they “give up” and bury their creativity, or they take their passion underground and launch a competing startup. As employees hear countless variations of “great idea … but not now” they become increasingly jaded. This means the vast majority of innovative ideas never have a fighting chance. As a result, along the path from initial concept to real-world innovation any of a dozen (or more!) influential executives can stop the train in its tracks. Usually that point never quite materializes, until it’s too late.įurthermore, to see the light of day, innovations typically require at least some degree of resources (funding, staffing, specific expertise), and both operational and functional support and buy-in. Their natural (correct) reaction is to shelve such ideas until they make sense to pursue. Innovative ideas are by definition risky, uncertain or both - which operational leaders will correctly recognize as threats to profitability and efficiency. But that’s when even more deeply rooted problems arise. Google) sometimes avoid this culture trap. The most enlightened and well-managed companies (e.g. As Peter Drucker quipped, culture eats strategy for breakfast. Even the most daring and creative employees struggle to trust that Big Brother is acting in good faith because in most companies, the very notion of the 80/20 time violates our normal expectations of corporate life. However, it’s a very bad idea to use the 80/20 rule as an innovation panacea. The 80/20 rule is a clever policy lever (among many) for sanctioning “time for innovation.” Because we are all so busy executing - meeting deadlines, delivering revenue, pleasing the boss - it’s not impossible to find time for anything new, unproven or risky. Innovation is a very difficult rhythm to scale across a large, distributed organization in which the largest barriers, by far, are time and attention. In one respect, the 80/20 rule is very obviously a good idea. Understanding the interplay between them is critical to understanding how innovation actually happens within large companies. Which begs the question: Have we been wrong all along? Is the 80/20 rule, in fact, a bad idea? Yet now, suddenly, Google may be pulling the plug. Image: bryanesque/Flickrĭating back at least to 2007, Google’s 80/20 policy has famously granted employees 20 percent time for creative side projects - and has been widely emulated by companies (such as Hootsuite) as a best practice for unlocking enterprise-wide creativity and innovation. ![]() 80/20 up in the air at the Googleplex: Is juggling time between core work and innovation a bad idea? Have your say. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |